CEO 19-9—April 17, 2019
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
STATE UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES CONTRACTING WITH THE UNIVERSITY
ON MATTERS UNRELATED TO THEIR UNIVERSITY DUTIES
To: Names withheld at persons' request (Tallahassee)
SUMMARY:
Under the circumstances presented, based on the application of Section 112.316, Florida Statutes, a prohibited conflict of interest will not be created under either Section 112.313(3) or Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, were a company owned by two technical support persons employed in Information Technology Services at a State University to contract with the University to provide catering services at various events, provided that the events are not being organized by Information Technology Services, as the employees have no responsibilities in their public capacities regarding the University's selection or procurement of caterers. CEO 18-5, 18-4, and 07-12 are referenced.1
QUESTION:
Would a prohibited conflict of interest be created if a company you co-own contracts with a State University to provide catering services, where you are employed by the University in Information Technology Services but your positions do not involve selecting or procuring caterers for University events?
Under the circumstances presented, your question is answered in the negative.
In your letter of inquiry, additional information provided to our staff, and telephone conversations between you and our staff, you state you are employees in Information Technology Services at a State University and, in your private capacities, are co-owners of a catering company. You indicate your company is included on the list of catering vendors kept by an events facility at the University. You relate that University offices, departments, and colleges who host events—as well as some private entities who host events—often contact the University to obtain catering recommendations, and the University provides them with this list.
You further explain that, in your capacities at the University, you have no involvement with, nor influence over, the selection of catering companies for University events. Rather, you relate your work at Information Technology Services is to ensure the technologies and equipment associated with campus-wide services—such as student enrollment services and payroll services—are functioning properly. You emphasize the technical services you perform may require you to interact with various offices, departments, and colleges of the University, but you follow the same processes and protocols with each office, department, and college, and have no particular influence with any part of the University outside of Information Technology Services. You also emphasize that the technical services you provide are unrelated to the catering of University events.
Your specific inquiry is whether you will have a prohibited conflict under any provision of the Code of Ethics should your company cater events offered by University offices, departments, and colleges who might select your company's name from the University's list. You indicate your company would not solicit these opportunities, but, rather, would respond to a University office, department, or college contacting your company due to its presence on the list.2
The prohibitions relevant to your inquiry are Sections 112.313(3) and 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, which state:
DOING BUSINESS WITH ONE'S AGENCY.--No employee of an agency acting in his or her official capacity as a purchasing agent, or public officer acting in his or her official capacity, shall either directly or indirectly purchase, rent, or lease any realty, goods, or services for his or her own agency from any business entity of which the officer or employee or the officer's or employee's spouse or child is an officer, partner, director, or proprietor or in which such officer or employee or the officer's or employee's spouse or child, or any combination of them, has a material interest. Nor shall a public officer or employee, acting in a private capacity, rent, lease, or sell any realty, goods, or services to the officer's or employee's own agency, if he or she is a state officer or employee, or to any political subdivision or any agency thereof, if he or she is serving as an officer or employee of that political subdivision . . . This subsection shall not affect or be construed to prohibit contracts entered into prior to:
(a) October 1, 1975.
(b) Qualification for elective office.
(c) Appointment to public office.
(d) Beginning public employment.
[Section 112.313(3), Florida Statutes.]
CONFLICTING EMPLOYMENT OR CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP.--No public officer or employee of an agency shall have or hold any employment or contractual relationship with any business entity or any agency which is subject to the regulation of, or is doing business with, any agency of which he is an officer or employee . . . ; nor shall an officer or employee of an agency have or hold any employment or contractual relationship that will create a continuing or frequently recurring conflict between his private interests and the performance of his public duties or that would impede the full and faithful discharge of his public duties. [Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes.]
Were the language of the prohibitions to be considered alone, your company would be selling services to the University (your public agency3), thereby triggering the second part of Section 112.313(3), and you would have an employment or contractual relationship with your company, a business entity, which, by virtue of the catering contract, would be doing business with the University, thereby triggering the first part of Section 112.313(7)(a).4
However, in the past, and in response to unique circumstances, the Commission has applied Section 112.316, Florida Statutes, to negate the application of Sections 112.313(3) and 112.313(7)(a) when a public officer or employee lacks any public capacity responsibility regarding the relationship between his public agency and his private business. Section 112.316 provides:
CONSTRUCTION.—It is not the intent of this part, nor shall it be construed, to prevent any officer or employee of a state agency or county, city, or other political subdivision of the state or any legislator or legislative employee from accepting other employment or following any pursuit which does not interfere with the full and faithful discharge by such officer, employee, legislator, or legislative employee of his or her duties to the state or the county, city, or other political subdivision of the state involved.
In CEO 07-12, a State University professor inquired whether he would have a prohibited conflict were his architectural/engineering firm to contract with the University to perform work on a project. The Commission applied Section 112.316 to negate the application of Sections 112.313(3) and 112.313(7)(a) as it found the professor played no role at the University concerning the project or the potential contract between the University and his firm. See, also, among others, CEO 18-4 (using Section 112.316 to negate the application of Section 112.313(3) where a city councilperson's company was intending to sell construction services to a local school system encompassed within city government because the city council had no responsibilities regarding the business between the company and the school system) and CEO 18-5 (using Section 112.316 to negate the application of Section 112.313(3) where a company co-owned by a member of a city's planning and zoning board was selling goods and services to the city's community redevelopment agency because the planning and zoning board had no influence over which contracts the community redevelopment agency would approve).
Similarly, here, you relate your University employment responsibilities are not related to selecting caterers or providing catering at University events. Accordingly, under the particular circumstances presented in your inquiry, we find that Section 112.316 will negate the application of Sections 112.313(3) and 112.313(7)(a) if your company contracts to provide catering to University offices, departments, and colleges, provided that the catering is not for an event being sponsored by Information Technology Services.
Your question is answered accordingly.
ORDERED by the State of Florida Commission on Ethics meeting in public session on April 12, 2019, and RENDERED this 17th day of April, 2019.
____________________________________
Guy W. Norris, Chair
[1]Prior opinions of the Commission on Ethics may be obtained from its website (www.ethics.state.fl.us).
[2]While your written inquiry concerned catering an event being sponsored by the University's Office of Faculty Development and Advancement, you clarified in subsequent phone conversations that you seek an opinion addressing whether you may cater events for various University offices, departments, or colleges.
[3]For the purposes of Sections 112.313(3) and 112.313(7)(a), your "agency" would be the entire University, as Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes, defines the term "agency" as "... any public school, community college, or state university ... ."
[4]You relate by phone that any catering contract would be between the University and your company.